Blog

Sep 20, 2023

Effect of struvite (Crystal Green) fertilization on soil element content determined by different methods under soybean cultivation

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 12702 (2023) Cite this article 271 Accesses 2 Altmetric Metrics details Struvite is regarded as a promising phosphorus fertilizer alternative to mineral

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 12702 (2023) Cite this article

271 Accesses

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

Struvite is regarded as a promising phosphorus fertilizer alternative to mineral fertilizers; however before fertilizing, soil tests should be undertaken to determine fertilizer recommendations. In May 2022, soil was sampled from a pot experiment with the application of phosphorus set up at the Wroclaw University and Environmental and Life Sciences. Chemical analysis of the soil included total and available phosphorus, potassium, magnesium determined by the Egner–Riehm, Mehlich 3 and Yanai methods. The purpose of the article is to compare soil element extraction by three different methods under struvite fertilization and its use in soybean cultivation. The application of these methods indicated an unambiguous increase in soil Mg content after struvite application. Broadcast soybean fertilization affected the phosphorus content of the soil. The results of the study indicated that different extraction methods presented different contents of P from soil. The content of available phosphorus was circa 122–156 mg kg−1 dm, 35.4–67.5 mg kg−1 dm and 100–159 mg kg−1 dm according to the Mehlich, Yanai and Egner–Riehm methods, respectively. A positive correlation was found between the content of Mg and K in soil determined by the Mehlich 3 and Yanai methods, which may suggest that the Yanai method could be introduced into standard soil chemical analysis in Poland. Such a correlation was not found for phosphorus, which is a difficult element to determine due to the multitude of factors affecting its availability.

Phosphorus is an important element enhancing the nutrient richness and fertility of soils. It is also a pivotal component, responsible for the proper functioning of plants and leading to high quantity and good quality yields. The actual extent of commercially viable global phosphate rock reserves has remained a subject of considerable uncertainty in recent years1. It is estimated that at the current rate of use, the global phosphorus (P) reserve is sufficient for 600–1000 years2,3. P rock reserves are being depleted, thus threatening long-term global food security. Thus, alternatives for P are being investigated.

A promising possibility is struvite (MgNH4PO46H2O), which can be recovered from sewage sludge. Struvite recovery has several additional advantages not only in agriculture sector but also in wastewater treatment plants4,5,6, as struvite is regarded as an alternative source of elements such as phosphorus, nitrogen and magnesium for agricultural purposes7,8,9. Struvite has a theoretical P content close to that of phosphate rock (12.6% dry weight [DW]) and has been shown to be an effective P fertilizer especially in acidic soils and is considered a slow-release fertilizer that can reduce P losses to the environment10,11. Struvite also contains some heavy metals, as wastewater contains a significant amount of such elements; however, these occur within acceptable limits, as has been proved in our own research12. Experimental data from various plant species proves that struvite fertilization results in similar plant yields to those achieved with mineral fertilization7,8,12,13,14,15.

Among nutrients, phosphorus in soil is one of the most difficult to analyse because of its various forms, such as P dissolved in soil solution; P absorbed in clay minerals, Fe and Al (hydr-)oxides; P in primary minerals organic P; and microbial P pools16. Phosphorus content is usually analysed with soil tests that have been developed over the last six decades17,18,19. Interpretation of phosphorus tests in soil is subject to considerable uncertainty. Soil phosphorus tests attempt to present plant uptake by extracting all or a proportional amount of this element available to plants. Examining the phosphorus content of the soil will help determine the appropriate phosphorus dose20. Numerous tests are used worldwide to determine soil P content, with more than 13 phosphorus tests developed for agronomic recommendations in America. Test selection usually depends on local soil conditions (e.g. some tests are better prepared to high or low pH conditions than others), although historical and institutional factors mainly influence test selection in different areas. Originally, all soil tests were analysed colorimetrically, such as the molybdenum blue method devised by Murphy and Riley21. After the implementation of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometry, new soil tests were developed in the 1970s and 1980s, allowing simultaneous measurement of many elements from a single soil extract16. In Poland, for a number of years, the Egner–Riehm method has been used to determine the abundance of soil in plant-available phosphorus and potassium22. It involves extracting phosphorus compounds from the soil using hydrochloric acid-acidified calcium lactate (CH3-CHOH-COO)2Ca). The solution used for extraction is 0.04 N to calcium lactate and 0.02 N to hydrochloric acid22.This method however, often proves insufficiently precise for the accurate determination of optimal plant doses of phosphorus to ensure high efficiency of fertilization and maintain at least average abundance of soil in plant-available phosphorus. Therefore, other, more complicated methods allowing the determination of the abundance of soil in different fractions of phosphorus should be used.

Mehlich 3 is a pivotal part of fertilizer recommendations for phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and some trace elements to achieve optimum yield; however, it is not so popular in Poland in chemical and agricultural stations23. This method is mainly used in the Czech Republic and in major parts of Canada and the USA24. The intended purpose of this test is to isolate portions of several different P pools that are correlated with the amount of phosphorus that is available to plants during the growing season23. The rationale for implementing the Mehlich 3 method for agrochemical testing in Poland is that it provides a relatively simple determination of potassium, calcium, sodium, magnesium, iron, manganese, copper, zinc, boron, sulfur and especially phosphorus in a single extracted soil extract. The determination of phosphorus content by the Mehlich 3 method is mainly influenced by soil factors such as soil type, clay content, mineralogy and pH. The universal extraction solution (pH 2.5 ± 0.01) is designed for the determination of soil samples with acidic and neutral pH which constitute the majority of soils used agriculturally in Poland. The disadvantages of Mehlich 3 are as follows: NO3−N cannot be evaluated; the F− ion in the extractor can dissolve K from glass bottles; and EDTA in the extractor precipitates after prolonged storage25. Another method that can be used instead is the Yanai method, where one single extracting solution is used to simultaneously to extract NO3−N, available P and B, exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg, easily reducible Mn, and HCl-soluble Zn and Cu25,26.To minimize analysis time and laboratory costs, research is focusing on developing multi-nutrient methods that can be used to analyse macro and micro nutrients from the same extract. A modified multi-element method was proposed by Yanai25,26 where the composition of the extraction solution is as follows: 0.2 M CH3COOH, 0.25 M NH4Cl, 0.005 M citric acid and 0.05 M HCl. In addition, it can be used to determine the nitrate content of the soil due to the fact that there are no nitrate ions in the composition of the solution26.

In the working hypothesis, we assumed that the P as well as Mg content of struvite-applied soil would increase in the soil determined by all methods, and that the Yanai method would be as promising as Mehlich 3 in analysing P and K in soil.

The objectives of the present study were to: (1) understand the effect of struvite fertilization on P, K, Mg content in soil under soybean fertilization; (2) compare three different laboratory methods for the analysis of element content in soil obtained by a pot experiment; and (3) select the most appropriate method for analysing element content.

There was no significant effect of the studied factors on soybean yield, i.e. K, Mg and P intake. Indeed, the most phosphorus was found in soybean under struvite fertilization (Table 1).

The effects of the method of fertilizer placement and various phosphorus fertilizers on K, P and Mg content in soil under soybean cultivation are presented in Table 2. The greatest content of K, P, Mg and pH was determined under band fertilization, while that for salinity was noted under broadcast fertilization (Table 2). Under struvite fertilization, the highest contents of the examined elements were seen under struvite fertilization. Struvite fertilization caused an increase in the examined elements compared to the control in the case of Mg, and the control and superphosphate in the cases of both K and P. Phosphorus fertilization decreased salinity in the soil. With regards to interaction between the examined factors, fertilization band caused a decrease in K content in the soil and an increase in the case of broadcast fertilization. The highest content of P was noted under struvite band fertilization. Interaction between the examined factors caused a decrease in soil salinity. Magnesium content also increased after struvite fertilization: by 17% compared to the control (all differences statistically not significant).

The method of placement of phosphate fertilizers gave comparable values for K, P and Mg content in the soil (Table 3, Fig. 1a). Phosphorus fertilizer caused differences in the contents of all elements tested. With struvite fertilization, potassium content increased by 2% compared to the control and by 14% compared to triple superphosphate. Magnesium content also increased after struvite fertilization: by 17% compared to the control. Phosphorus content decreased after struvite fertilization; however, this could have been caused by the slightly acidic pH of the soil. Polish soils have a very acidic or acidic reaction and thus affect phosphorus availability. The interaction between factors resulted in an increase in K content where struvite granules were applied near the germinating seeds. The greatest amount of magnesium in the soil was noted under both broadcast and band superphosphate fertilization (Table 3, Fig. 1a,b). The content of phosphorus and potassium in the samples compared to the control was statistically significantly lower (except for K after struvite administration) after administration of each fertilizer using the broadcast method. Mg content, on the other hand, was statistically significantly higher after fertilizer administration, in almost all combinations, than in the control samples.

(a) Mg, K and P content determined by Egner–Riehm under different fertilizer placement fertilization methods (mg kg−1 d m). (b) Mg, K and P content determined by Egner–Riehm under phosphorus fertilization (mg kg−1 d m).

The method of phosphorus placement differentiated K content in the soil, while P and Mg was at the same level (Fig. 2a). In the Mehlich 3 method, the values for all elements were higher under struvite fertilization. Magnesium content under struvite fertilization increased by 65% compared to the control and 50% compared to superphosphate (Table 4, Fig. 2b). Based on the limit numbers concerning Mehlich 3 developed by Kęsik22,26 the phosphorus content of the experiment after the application of superphosphate and struvite taking the soil reaction (5.6–5.8) was determined as average, potassium content—high and magnesium—low. Magnesium content under struvite fertilization increased statistically significantly: by 65% compared to the control and 50% compared to superphosphate (Table 4, Fig. 2b).

(a) Mg, K and P content determined by Mehlich 3 under different fertilizer placement fertilization methods (mg kg−1 d m). (b) Mg, K and P content determined by Mehlich 3 under phosphorus fertilization (mg kg−1 d m).

The greatest content of K, P, Mg was observed under broadcast fertilization (Table 5, Fig. 3a). Struvite fertilization caused increase of P and Mg content in the soil. Again as in the Mehlich 3 method, Mg content increased under struvite fertilization by 19% compared to control and by 60% compared to superphosphate (Fig. 3b). Mg content was statistically significantly lower under superphosphate fertilization by 24% compared to control, with band fertilizer lower by 24% with broadcast by 27%.

(a) Mg, K and P content determined by Yanai under different fertilizer placement phosphorus fertilization methods (mg kg−1 d m). (b) Mg, K and P content determined by Yanai under phosphorus fertilization (mg kg−1 d m).

The Mehlich and Yanai methods give correlated results which means that there is a statistically significant, linear relationship between them (Tables 6, 7). Thus, the indications generated by the methods can be considered proportional. On the basis of statistical analyses, a positive correlation was found between Mg and K content in soil as determined by the Mehlich 3 and Yanai methods. No such relationship was found for the Egner–Riehm method. With regard to phosphorus content, there was no correlation between any method, which may suggest that phosphorus is a sensitive element to determine and depends on many factors, the most important of which is soil pH.

Phosphorus measurements by each method indicated different results. It is not possible to indicate a linear relationship for the obtained concentrations for any pair of measurement methods with a statistical significance at the α = 0.05 level (Table 8).

The statistical significance of the linear correlation is confirmed by the scatterplot in Fig. 4. The regression line \(Mg\left(M\right)=0.932\times Mg\left(Y\right)+14.0\) with a statistically significant (with ∝  = 0.05) slope of 0.932 fitted with the least squares method allows an estimation of the results for one method based on the values obtained with another method. All linear regression assumptions are met (the model residuals conform to the normal distribution, residuals heteroscedasticity, no autocorrelation of residuals). The estimation is subject to a large error (standard estimation error 10.6) and goodness-of-fit measure \({R}^{2}=0.48\).

Scatter of Mg content in soil determined by the Yanai and Mehlich 3 methods.

A significant effect of phosphorus fertilization on soil K content was found by determining this element using the Egner–Riehm method. No such relationship was found using the other two methods (Table 9).

The method of phosphorus fertilizer placement had a significant effect on the phosphorus content of the soil as determined by the Egner–Riehm and Yanai methods. Phosphorus fertilization significantly modified the content of this element in the soil as determined by the Egner–Riehm method (Table 10).

The method of phosphorus fertilizer placement had a significant effect on the soil magnesium content determined by the Egner–Riehm method. Phosphorus fertilization significantly affected the content of this element as determined by the three methods being tested (Table 11).

In this study, we evaluated the performance of three methods in P, Mg and K determination in soil under struvite fertilization in soybean cultivation. Sims et al.27 claimed that the application of phosphorus fertilization in the form of organic waste and phosphorus fertilizers on the basis of soil abundance requires a test that is integrated with the requirements of agricultural practices for the management of this nutrient and that takes into account environmental risks.

In our study, P content under struvite decreased after soybean harvest, unlike in the study by Bastid et al.28 where P availability was highest in soil with struvite. In the study by Bastid et al.28, P availability was lower after one month. This decrease in P availability over one month may be due to P precipitation as Al, Fe and Ca phosphates and uptake by plants29,30. This decrease was also observed in our study and can also be explained by P precipitation, which is indicated by low pH. pH and salinity are the main factors influencing P sorption–desorption behaviours in soils31. Liu et al.32 observed that P sorption on sediments increases at low salinity, while it decreases as salinity increases (> 5‰). Struvite fertilization causes a decrease in salinity. Our study indicates a P sorption increase. In our experiment, the application of struvite reduced the phosphorus content in the soil. Under the influence of the application of struvite, the soil reaction decreased further. Phosphorus fertilization can cause a not dissimilar increase in the content of the available forms of phosphorus in the soil. In acidic and slightly acidic soils, phosphorus in the forms of leachable and P–Al can occur. This needs further research to determine the different forms (including fractions: easily soluble, exchangeable, bound to organic matter, bound to stable organic-mineral and mineral compounds, residual) of P. The available contents of P, K, Ca and Mg can decrease over time after fertilization as a result of their absorption and uptake by plants.

Soil fertilized with struvite presents slightly lower available P content and higher available Mg content, and this may be connected to the higher solubility of superphosphate according to Ref.33 and the higher amount of Mg contained in struvite.

In our study, struvite fertilization did not have a more significant effect on seed yield and phosphorus uptake than that seen in other studies15,34,35 but it did have an effect on seed phosphorus content. Despite the lack of significant differences, greater values of seed yield and P uptake can be attributed mainly to the greater amount of Mg contained in Crystal Green fertilizer and its synergistic effect on P uptake36. In agreement with34 P and Mg uptake were significantly dependent on P fertilization, while P dose had no significant effect on lettuce.

Phosphorus fertilization requires efficient fertilization technologies; thus, this issue also concerns struvite. In Talboys et al.9, struvite granules placed with the seed did not provide the same level of phosphorus supply as the DAP (diamonium phosphate) granules for early-growing spring wheat. However, it gave equivalent rates of P uptake, yield and apparent fertilizer recovery at harvest, even though only 26% of the struvite granules had completely dissolved. In our study, phosphorus content was higher in the soil placed broadcast. P diffusion when placed band to the root system is high because of the large concentration gradient compared with broadcast P placement. However, when bulk soil test P is high, the benefits of banded P are reduced, and this was probably the case in our study. Therefore, knowledge of soil test P levels is pivotal when determining placement options. The optimal balance between P banding and broadcast application is difficult to achieve37,38. Roots take up phosphate in the form of H2PO4 ions. When the pH is lowered from 6 to 4, the rate of phosphate uptake by roots increases, the amount of phosphate desorbed from the soil increases, and the amount of phosphate sorbed by the soil often increases, but this is not confirmed in our study, where surface-applied phosphorus supplied the soil with this element.

Fei et al.39 showed that long-term, continuous implementation of phosphorus into greenhouse soil—both in the form of mineral and natural (manure) fertilizers—used in vegetable production, caused its accumulation in the soil and enrichment of its top layers. The authors found a fourfold increase in total phosphorus content after 13 years of its use compared to the initial value. The total phosphorus content of soil usually varies between 500 and 800 (50–3000) mg P kg−1 soil and depends on many factors. The highest amount is found in the near-surface layers of the soil and decreases with the depth of the soil profile. In our study, the total P content varies from 255 to 366 mg kg−1 d m.

Our research shows that struvite is a good source of magnesium. Compared to the control, a noteworthy increase in soil magnesium content under the application of struvite is determined by the Yanai, Mehlich 3 and Egner–Riehm methods. STR is a source of P needed by the fertilizer market with agronomic and environmental benefits such as providing available Mg. However, the specific mechanism of Mg-release from soil after struvite application remains unexplained. In Poland, sandy soils cover several million hectares. Most are, simultaneously, under-fertilized and magnesium-deficient soils. Thus, further research should be conducted. Fertilizer application could solve the magnesium deficit occurring in the soils of Central and Eastern Europe. As in our study, a significant increased content of magnesium was also found by Szymanska et al.13,40 in the first year after the application of struvite.

According to the Egner–Riehm method, the application of struvite resulted in a significant increase in soil potassium content. In the study by Kas et al.41, organic fertilization increased the K content of soils almost two-fold compared to mineral fertilization. Significantly lower K content was found in soils with control and NPK. Cong et al.42 showed that deficiencies in N, P and Mg reduced the effectiveness of applied K and may have been the cause of increased leaching of K from the arable layer; this is consistent with our study. Struvite contains N and P in its composition and, compared to superphosphate used on this soil, K content increased. This increase may affect the concentration of K in the soil due to the antagonism that can appear between K and Mg42.

Chemically, phosphorus is a low-mobility element available to plants only direct from the space of the roots and its uptake is highly dependent on soil reaction and temperature; hence, the idea of the above study43. The forms in which phosphorus is accumulated in the soil depend on management practices, fertilizer sources and application methods, which can promote different solubility of phosphorus and its uptake by plants44.

The Mehlich and Yanai methods allows examination in a single soil extract of not only the content of basic macronutrients such as phosphorus, potassium and magnesium, but also other important nutrients, e.g. micronutrients such as boron, copper and others24. The result is a significant reduction in energy and water consumption, as well as a marked reduction in labour intensity and reagent costs. This makes the method cheaper and more environmentally friendly. From the farmer’s point of view, the most important advantage of the Mehlich 3 method is the cost of determining P, K and available Mg (and pH) in one soil sample. The cost of element determination with the Egner–Riehm method is around 27% higher compared to Mehlich 3. Mehlich 3 method has been gradually implemented in Poland since 2015. Limit numbers have been determined for each element for Mehlich, while no such numbers have been determined for the Yanai method resulting in a lack of interest in introducing this method on a larger scale22,25,26.

A greenhouse experiment was established to assess the effect of struvite fertilization on content elements in soil under soybean cultivation. The 0–30 cm soil depth was used in the experiment with samples from the Experimental Station of Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences (Pawłowice) (geographical location 17° 7′ E and 51° 08′ N in the Lower Silesian Voivodship, Wrocław, Poland). A pot experiment was established in 2022 at the Experimental Station of Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences (Pawłowice) using fertilizer produced from sewage sludge (Crystal Green) in soybean cultivation. The two-factor experiment was conducted in six replications. The first factor was the differential placement of phosphorus fertilizer (band and broadcast). Surface fertilization consisted of random placement of fertilizers on the surface of the pot, while broadcast was done by placing fertilizer granules at a depth of about 5 cm below the sown soybean seed. The second factor was differentiated phosphorus fertilizers against the control. Two phosphorus fertilizers were used in the experiment: traditional triple superphosphate (SUP), commonly used in soybean cultivation, and Crystal Green (CG). In the experiment, the effect of a fertilizer produced on the base of sewage sludge with the trade name Crystal Green (produced by Ostara Nutrient Technologies) was studied in comparison with the traditional fertilizer, triple superphosphate26. The white granules of struvite measured around approximately 1–2 mm in diameter. Phosphorus recovery comprised phosphorus minerals precipitation from sewage sludge as struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate, MgNH4PO4 6H2O). Struvite contains N (2%), P (24%) and Mg (10%) and is characterized by a low heavy metal content compared to triple superphosphate7,15. From the chemical point of view, it is not pure struvite.

The total number of pots was 36. The pot diameter was 20 cm, depth 20 cm and the volume around 5000 cm3. The pots were filled with soil which was mixed with SUP, CG, nitrogen and potassium fertilizer. The particle size distribution of the mineral parts corresponded to sandy clay.

Soil with the following parameters was used in the experiment:

Mehlich 3 method: P—126, K—134, Mg—49 mg kg−1 d m (average content of P, according to limit numbers, K—low content, Mg—low content)26,45.

Yanai method: P 45.2, K—151, Mg—45.6 mg kg−1 d m (limit numbers have not been developed).

Egner–Riehm method: P—103, K—220, Mg—38 mg kg−1 d m (P—average content, K—high content, Mg—low/average content)22,45.

Fertilizer doses in the experiment were based on the optimum for growing soybeans under field conditions, i.e. 70 kg ha−1 P2O5, 120 kg ha−1 K2O, and a starter dose of nitrogen 30 kg ha−1 N. Only nitrogen and potassium were applied at the same dose. The following fertilizer doses per pot were applied (converted):

Struvite—0.76 g,

Superphosphate—0.54 g,

Ammonium nitrate—0.27 g,

Potassium salt—1.25 g.

Abellina soybean seeds were sown into pots of 4 in the second decade of May 2022. The treated soybean seeds were provided by Saatbau and had been inoculated46. Soybean seeds were inoculated within Fix Fertig technology which involves factory-coating seeds with bacteria that are dormant. The seeds were coated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteria.

Prior to sowing, germination capacity was determined based on current standards. The germination capacity of the tested variety averaged 75%. The number of seeds sown per pot was based on the optimal density of soybean seeds under these conditions. No significant pests or weeds were found in the soybean during the experiment, so the use of herbicides was not necessary. Soybeans were watered regularly.

Samples for chemical analysis were taken after the end of the growing season. The content of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium in the plant material was determined colorimetrically: P using ammonium vanadomolybdate, Mg using the titanium yellow method, and K colorimetrically. The uptake of P, Mg and K was based on soybean seed yield and the content of these macronutrients in soybean seeds. Seed yield was converted per hectare at 15% moisture content.

Soil samples were taken from the 0–20 cm layer after the end of the soybean growing season (October 2022) using a Egner stick. For broadcast and band fertilization treatments, soil samples from each pot were created by subsampling. Soil from three or four locations was then mixed to form a subsample. This procedure was repeated three times for each pot, and these were mixed to form a surface sample. Soil samples were air-dried, disaggregated using a porcelain pestle and mortar, and sieved to < 2 mm. A portion of each sample was further finely ground for analysis. The soil for the pots was sieved through a sieve with a mesh diameter of 10 mm. The particle size distribution of the mineral part were determined using a Mastersizer 2000 laser diffractometer.

Soil pH was measured with a glass pH electrode (1:5 soil:deionized water, measurements after 30 min) and conductivity was assessed using a conductivity meter (the conductivity method). Total phosphorus, potassium and magnesium content was determined after microwave mineralization while available forms were determined with the Egner–Riehm, Mehlich 3 and Yanai methods.

Phosphorus and potassium compounds in a soil according to the Egner–Riehm method were extracted with a lactate buffer consisting of calcium lactate and lactic acid. The described reaction occurs according to the formula:

The extraction solution used had pH = 3.55 (at this level of acidity, extraction conditions are maintained regardless of the initial soil reaction)26. Phosphorus, potassium and magnesium content in soil was determined according the Egner–Riehm method, see details in Table 12.

The air-dry soil sample was extracted with Mehlich 3 solution (a solution containing 0.2 mol l−1 CH3COOH, 0.25 mol l−1 NH4NO3, 0.015 mol l−1 NH4F, 0.013 mol l−1 HNO3, and 0.001 mol l−1 EDTA). The air-dry soil sample was extracted with Mehlich 3 solution by volume ratio of 1:10. For this purpose, two grams of dry soil was weighed into an extraction vessel (a plastic bottle with a capacity of about 150 ml) and then 20 ml of Mehlich solution 3 was added. The sample was shaken for 5 min at 220 cycles min−1 on a shaker machine and filtered through medium filters. The solution prepared in this way was analysed for potassium, phosphorus and magnesium content using inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry ICP-OES (Table 12).

An air-dry soil sample was extracted with Yanai solution (a solution containing 0.2 mol l−1 CH3COOH, 0.25 mol l−1 NH4Cl, 0.005 mol l−1 C6H8O7, and 0.05 mol l−1 HCl) with a volume ratio of 1:10. For this purpose, 5 g of soil were weighed into a 100 ml plastic extraction bottle, 50 ml of extractant was added and the mixture was shaken for 30 min at a rate of 180 cycles min−1. Shaking was done on a soil shaker. The solution was then filtered through Advantec Toyo filter paper No.5. The solution prepared in this way was analysed for potassium, phosphorus and magnesium content using inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry ICP-OES. A sample of the resulting soil extract was carried out into mist form and transferred to a plasma torch, where it was excited at a high frequency and measurement of atomic emission of radiation for the appropriate wavelengths was performed.

Data from chemical analyses (P, Mg, K, pH, salinity) were subjected to Anova/Manova statistical analysis in Statistica software (version 13.1 StatSoft, Poland)47. The level of significance was α = 0.05. One-way and two-way analyses of averages were performed to determine the effects of P fertilizer on chemical analyses of soil. Correlations and figures have been prepared using Statistica software.

In summary, it should be concluded that traditional phosphorus fertilizers can be substituted with struvite, which would simultaneously support a circular economy. Based on the results of the study, there was an increase of 34–37% in available magnesium in the soil after struvite application compared to superphosphate; this was dependent on the analytical method (Mehlich 3 and Yanai). Available phosphorus content in the soil increased under struvite application by 4% relative to superphosphate and 16% relative to the control (Mehlich 3). However, long-term field experiments are needed as a way to measure sustainable phosphorus fertilization in agriculture, as they contribute to a better understanding of the effects of struvite and examine which fractions of phosphorus will dominate in the soil after struvite application in regard to the care and protection of the soil environment. Additionally, similar field experiments are also required to evaluate the soil macronutrient abundance classes for the Yanai method, which—due to its lower cost compared to the Egner–Riehm method—has the ability to determine a larger pool of elements than the other two methods. Therefore, in the case of the introduction of the Yanai method into analytics at chemical-agricultural stations, it would be necessary to develop limit values based on such long-term field experiments.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Experimental research and field studies on plants (either cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant material are complying with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. I declare that the plant material used for our study was purchased from SAATBAU company in Środa Śląska (Poland) as seed material. We did not use endangered plant species for the experiments.

Vaccari, D. A. Phosphorus: A looming. Sci. Am. 300(6), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0609-54 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jama-Rodzeńska, A., Białowiec, A., Koziel, J. A. & Sowiński, J. Waste to phosphorus: A transdisciplinary solution to P recovery from wastewater based on the TRIZ approach. J. Environ. Manag. 11(9), 985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112235 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cordell, D., Drangert, J. O. & White, S. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change. 19(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Kirchmann, H., Börjesson, G., Kätterer, T. & Cohen, Y. From agricultural use of sewage sludge to nutrient extraction: A soil science outlook. Ambio 46, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0816-3 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Egle, L., Rechberger, H., Krampe, J. & Zessner, M. Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater: An integrated comparative technological, environmental and economic assessment of P recovery technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 571(15), 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.019 (2016).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Amann, A. et al. Environmental impacts of phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 130, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.002 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Jama Rodzeńska, A. et al. Effect of various rates of P from alternative and traditional sources on Butterhead Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown on peat substrate. Agric. 11(12), 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121279 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Borowik, M. et al. Effect of struvite fertilizers on yield and structural characteristics of spring wheat. Przem. Chem. 97(3), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.15199/62.2018.3.24 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Talboys, P. J. et al. Struvite: A slow-release fertiliser for sustainable phosphorus management?. Plant Soil 401, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2747-3 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Everaert, M., da Silva, R. C., Degryse, F., McLaughlin, M. J. & Smolders, E. Limited dissolved phosphorus runoff losses from layered double hydroxide and struvite fertilizers in a rainfall simulation study. J. Environ. Qual. 47(2), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.07.0282 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hertzberger, A. J., Cusick, R. D. & Margenot, A. J. A review and meta-analysis of the agricultural potential of struvite as a phosphorus fertilizer. Soil Sci. Soc Am. J. 84(3), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20065 (2020).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Plaza, C. et al. Greenhouse evaluation of struvite and sludges from municipal wastewater treatment works as phosphorus sources for plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55(20), 8206–8212. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf071563y (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Szymańska, M. et al. Evaluating the struvite recovered from anaerobic digestate in a farm bio-refinery as a slow-release fertiliser. Energies 13(20), 5342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205342 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Huygens, D. & Saveyn, H. G. M. Agronomic efficiency of selected phosphorus fertilisers derived from secondary raw materials for European agriculture. A meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38, 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0527-1 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jama-Rodzeńska, A. The effect of phosgreen fertilization on the growth and phosphorus uptake of lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 27, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1892 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Vona, V. et al. Comparing different phosphorus extraction methods: Effects of influencing parameters. Sustain. 14(4), 2158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042158 (2022).

Article MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar

Van Raij, B. New diagnostic techniques, universal soil extractants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25, 799–816 (1994).

Article Google Scholar

Wuenscher, R., Unterfrauner, H., Peticzka, R. & Zehetner, F. A comparison of 14 soil phosphorus extraction methods applied to 50 agricultural soils from Central Europe. Plant Soil Environ. 61, 86–96 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Khan, M. S., Zaidi, A., Ahemad, M., Oves, M. & Wani, P. A. Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing fungi—Current perspective. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 69(10), 1817–1832. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340902806469 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Neyroud, J.-A. & Lischer, P. Do different methods used to estimate soil phosphorous availability across Europe give comparable results?. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 166, 422–431 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5 (1962).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Fotyma, M. & Kęsik, K. Stan i perspektywy badań dotyczących przemian fosforu w glebie i nawożenia tym składnikiem. Prace Nauk. AE Wrocław. Chemia 267, 67–89 (1984).

CAS Google Scholar

Mehlich, A. Determination of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and NH4; Mimeo (North Carolina Soil Testing Division, 1953).

Google Scholar

Sims, J. T., Maguire, R. O., Leytem, A. B., Gartley, K. L. & Pautler, M. C. Evaluation of Mehlich-3 as an agri-environmental soil phosphorus test for the Mid-Atlantic United States of America. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 2016–2032. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.2016 (2002).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Yanai, M., Uwasawa, M. & Shimizu, Y. Development of a new multinutrient extraction method for macro- and micro-nutrients in arable land soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 46(2), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2000.10408786 (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tonutare, T., Tõnutare, T., Kõlli, R., Krebstein, K. &, Vennik, K. Soil phosphorus content determined by Mehlich 3 and modified Mehlich 3 methods, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-4568. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4568 (2023).

Sims, J. T. Soil test phosphorus: Olsen P. In Methods for Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals and Water (ed. Pierzynski, G. M.) 20–21 (Kansas State University, 2000).

Google Scholar

Bastida, F. et al. The effects of struvite and sewage sludge on plant yield and the microbial community of a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Geoderma 337, 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.046 (2019).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Paul, T. & Andrade, R. B. Sequential cross-metathesis/phosphorus-based olefination: Stereoselective synthesis of 2,4-dienoates. Tetrahedron Lett. 48(31), 5367–5370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.06.031 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kruse, J. et al. Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research: A review. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 178(1), 43–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400327 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bai, J. et al. Phosphorus sorption–desorption and effects of temperature, pH and salinity on phosphorus sorption in marsh soils from coastal wetlands with different flooding conditions. Chemosphere 188, 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.117 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liu, M. et al. Phosphate adsorption characteristics of tidal flat surface sediments and its environmental effect from the Yangtze estuary. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geogr. Sin. 57(4), 397–406 (2002).

Google Scholar

Bhuiyan, M. I. H., Mavinic, D. S. & Beckie, R. D. A solubility and thermodynamic study of struvite. Environ. Technol. 28(7), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332808618857 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ricardo, G. P., López-de-Sá, E. G. & Plaza, C. Lettuce response to phosphorus fertilization with struvite recovered from municipal wastewater. HortScience 44(2), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.44.2.426 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Jama-Rodzeńska, et al. Effect of various rates of P from alternative and traditional sources on butterhead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown on peat substrate. Agric. 11(12), 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121279 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mengel, K. & Kirkby, E. A. Principles of Plant Nutrition (Springer, 2004).

Barber, S. A. Efficient fertilizer use. In Agronomic Research for Food 13–29 (ed. Peterson, F. L.) (Am. Soc. of Agron., 1976).

Barber, S. A. & Kovar, J. L. Review—Principles of applying phosphorus fertilizer for greatest efficiency. J. Fertil. Issues 2(3), 91–94 (1985).

Google Scholar

Fei, L., Zhao, M., Chen, X. & Shi, Y. Effects of phosphorus accumulation in soil with the utilization ages of the vegetable greenhouses in the suburb of Shenyang. Proc. Environ. Sci. 8, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.10.005 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Szymanska, M. et al. Struvite—An innovative fertilizer from anaerobic digestate produced in a bio-refinery. Energies 12(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020296 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Káš, M., Mühlbachová, G., Kusá, H. & Pechová, M. Soil phosphorus and potassium availability in long-term field experiments with organic and mineral fertilization. Plant Soil Environ. 12, 558–565. https://doi.org/10.17221/534/2016-PSE (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Cong, R. H. et al. Evaluate regional potassium fertilization strategy of winter oilseed rape under intensive cropping systems: Large-scale field experiment analysis. Field Crop Res. 193, 34–42 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Hinsinger, P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: A review. Plant Soil 237, 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013351617532 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

de Nunes, R. S. et al. Distribution of soil phosphorus fractions as a function of long-term soil tillage and phosphate fertilization management. Front. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00350 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Fotyma, M., Kęsik, K., Lipiński, W., Filipiak, K. & Purchała, L. Testy glebowe jako podstawa doradztwa nawozowego. Studia i raporty IUNG-PIB 42(16), 9 (2015).

Google Scholar

Saatbau, Poland (www.saatbau.pl, Środa Śląska, Poland).

Statistica. Data Analysis Software System, Version 12 (Statsoft Inc., 2014).

Egnér, H., Riehm, H. & Domingo, W.R. Untersuchungen uber die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage fur die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor-und Kaliumbestimmung. Kungliga Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler, 26, 199–215 (1960) (in German).

Download references

The APC/BPC is financed/co-financed by Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences and by the National Centrum of Science DEC-2022/06/X/ST10/00047.

Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland

Anna Jama-Rodzeńska

Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland

Bernard Gałka

Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630, Wroclaw, Poland

Anna Szuba-Trznadel

Center for Environmental Quality Analysis, Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland

Anita Jandy

Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland

Joanna A. Kamińska

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

A.J.R., B.G.—wrote the main manucript A.J.—chemical analysis of the soil A.S.T.—literature, visualisation J.A.K. statistical analysis.

Correspondence to Bernard Gałka.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Jama-Rodzeńska, A., Gałka, B., Szuba-Trznadel, A. et al. Effect of struvite (Crystal Green) fertilization on soil element content determined by different methods under soybean cultivation. Sci Rep 13, 12702 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39753-8

Download citation

Received: 02 February 2023

Accepted: 30 July 2023

Published: 05 August 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39753-8

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.